3 ms·
First, it's ssl only. Second, the alternative (which I'm trying to avoid and where this idea came from) is a user being prompted for a password and responding s
by cubicle67 15y ago
First, it's ssl only. Second, the alternative (which I'm trying to avoid and where this idea came from) is a user being prompted for a password and responding something like "er, um... Password123" or just using the same password they use for everything else
The idea was that this may give users a bit more time to think about passwords, and possibly be more secure than the usual passwords. Stating the idea here is giving me some good things to consider
- mattgreenrocks 15y agoWhy not use OAuth or something similar so you deal with auth tokens, rather than passwords?
- cubicle67 15y agoBecause I'm dealing with exactly the type of users who think 1234 is a great password.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]