9 ms·
> Why ask/force people not to have a family where we could have happy family living responsibly? I'm sorry, but you know that people can still have families (u
by chuckee 5y ago
> Why ask/force people not to have a family where we could have happy family living responsibly?
I'm sorry, but you know that people can still have families (up to 2.1 children/woman on average) while staying below the replacement reproduction rate (so resulting in population reduction). So why pretend that they're being asked to give up families entirely?
- rcMgD2BwE72F 5y agoYou'll have to explain that to those who want 3+ children. I know a few that will fight for their rights to have as many children as they desire. I personnally believe population control is just a way not to challenge our way of life. Because if you get them to actually care about the environment (our future), then people will ajust their family's dream (why have another child if it makes life worst for the first one?).
- chuckee 5y agoYour initial claim was that people would be asked to have no family. At least acknowledge that the choice is "large family" vs. "medium/small family", and not "family" vs. "no family", instead of blithely shifting the argument.