WRT "political speech on private property" (Yes, US-specific.) From https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/583/pruneyard-shopping-center-v-robins https:/

WRT "political speech on private property" (Yes, US-specific.) From https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/583/pruneyard-shopping-center-v-robins https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/583/pruneyard-s... "In PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), the Supreme Court ruled that California could interpret its state constitution to protect political protesters from being evicted from private property, held open to the public, without running afoul of the Fifth Amendment. In this case, the California court went beyond the federal rule and held that, under the California constitution, a shopping mall owner could not exclude a group of high school students who were engaged in political advocacy. The state court decision has been adopted in one form or another by a substantial minority of states."