4 ms·

ORCL, MSFT, SalesForce and a few others would pay 10B+ to own those relationships and control of the future of the product

• johannes1234321 5y ago
  If they were paying more than an IPO value they probably would buy already ...
  • gitfan86 5y ago
    Gitlab doesn't want to sell
    • johannes1234321 5y ago
      GitLab Just (partially) sold. However: If they don't want to (fully) sell basing the price on a value someone else might eventually pay for a (full) acquisition doesn't make much sense. (Unless you assume they revise the decision, but then the argument about not selling is moot again)
      • gitfan86 5y ago
        Look at Facebook. Zuck has no interest in giving up full control to someone else, but he does want to be a public company.
        • johannes1234321 5y ago
          Yes, since FB is a money printing machine producing lots of revenue which is some argument forms one market value for parts of a company. The argument Here was "ORCL, MSFT, SalesForce and a few others would pay 10B+" but those would pay those valuations only for full control. FB's market cap is around 900B$. Gaining full control over FB would be valued a lot more.