4 ms·
I prefer to use Intellij now for reviews. How can people review any kind of code in that PR web UI ? I mean I used to do it but not anymore
by Gepsens 5y ago
I prefer to use Intellij now for reviews. How can people review any kind of code in that PR web UI ? I mean I used to do it but not anymore
- marceloabsousa 5y agoWould be very curious about your thoughts on Reviewpad (https://reviewpad.com https://reviewpad.com). The interactions you have on the IDE are very different than a tool that was specifically made for code reviews.
- NmAmDa 5y agoI really enjoy the idea. Seems like a good tool to use. do you plan to release an arm64 docker version soon?
- nyanpasu64 5y agoDo you review code in the code editor, the git diff, or some specialized full-PR/MR diff with integration with online comments and discussions? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40217494/how-to-review-a-pull-request-in-intellij-idea https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40217494/how-to-review-a... says IntelliJ has GitHub-only specialized PR review/commenting.
- dhritzkiv 5y agoYeah, I should really quit struggling with Gitlab's. For really large MRs, I use Tower + Kaleidoscope to view the changes. But then I can't easily leave a comment on a line of code (a big part of the review process)
- nhoughto 5y agoyeah there seems like there is some web -> idea connection that should exist for super slick in-IDE reviews. Best reviews means most context, IDE has the most context about the code (is why its best to resolve merge conflicts too) so we should be leveraging it more. Always surprised to see people resolving merge conflicts anywhere other than their IDE, IDE has the most knowledge about the inputs to the merge and your chosen resolution, why would you ignore that important info? (like.. does the resulting file compile? for ex..)