I had my comment misinterpreted along similar lines as you are proposing in the first sentence. That's frustrating because the title is not editorialized at all

I had my comment misinterpreted along similar lines as you are proposing in the first sentence. That's frustrating because the title is not editorialized at all, and I think is an accurate description of the content of the piece. It is true that this is not a proposal to "get rid of grading" or "pass everyone," but the simple fact that this is trying to maintain meritocracy and improve learning outcomes is the bare minimum and does not mean that it is beyond reproach. I recognize that this is an attempt to merge equity and meritocracy, but I disagree with the approach and rigor of the method. I don't think it's the obvious improvement that you might hold it to be.