3 ms·
That’s why the comparison is apt. “Cars are were bad for cities” isn’t a remotely hot take, and yet nobody claims that the invention of the car was a net-negati
by wtfrmyinitials 5y ago
That’s why the comparison is apt. “Cars are were bad for cities” isn’t a remotely hot take, and yet nobody claims that the invention of the car was a net-negative for the world.
- maxwell 5y agoI claim that automobiles have been a net-negative for the world. You'd argue the rollout of automobiles has been a net-positive? By which metric(s)?