> My point is mostly that MPs are not broadly entitled to use private platforms to speak unopposed I don't read the MP's objection to YouTube as expressing the

> My point is mostly that MPs are not broadly entitled to use private platforms to speak unopposed I don't read the MP's objection to YouTube as expressing the position that he has the right to speak unopposed. I read the MP's position as objecting to the idea that his opponents have the right to speak unopposed. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.