8 ms·

> Part of good design is that it's discoverable. A more fitting term here, perhaps, is "affordance" (though "discoverable" is also accurate, but "affordance" i

by junon 5y ago

> Part of good design is that it's discoverable. A more fitting term here, perhaps, is "affordance" (though "discoverable" is also accurate, but "affordance" is a more technical term here). A mug without a handle can burn your hand. Adding the handle is a way to avoid that. The handle itself is usually designed to look like a handle. It's clear what the handle does, based solely on its form. You don't need a manual or an example or a hint to use the handle - most people, intuitively, will use the handle as intended. The handle has "affordance". Waving your hand over the top of a computer in order to use a 'button', in contrast, has little to no affordance. The comma on this site acting as a button has no affordance. And so on.

davidivadavid 5y ago
You're misusing the term affordance (not blaming you, Don Norman himself has written about how it's constantly misused). You can wave your hand over anything (unless something is blocking your way or is too far, etc.), therefore most stuff affords being waved over. A mug, with or without a handle, affords "being held with your hand"(although more or less comfortably). What you're talking about is a signifier. Quoting from a random article: As Don Norman explains it: “[…] although affordances make sense for interaction with physical objects, they are confusing when dealing with virtual ones. As a result, affordances have created much confusion in the world of design. Affordances define what actions are possible. Signifiers specify how people discover those possibilities: signifiers are signs, perceptible signals of what can be done. Signifiers are of far more importance to designers than are affordances.” [Donald A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition, 2013, pXIV-XV]
- junon 5y ago
  TIL, thanks :) I've only ever had it used/explained in the manner my previous comment did. Always happy to be corrected there.

by junon 5y ago

davidivadavid 5y ago

You're misusing the term affordance (not blaming you, Don Norman himself has written about how it's constantly misused). You can wave your hand over anything (unless something is blocking your way or is too far, etc.), therefore most stuff affords being waved over. A mug, with or without a handle, affords "being held with your hand"(although more or less comfortably). What you're talking about is a signifier. Quoting from a random article: As Don Norman explains it: “[…] although affordances make sense for interaction with physical objects, they are confusing when dealing with virtual ones. As a result, affordances have created much confusion in the world of design. Affordances define what actions are possible. Signifiers specify how people discover those possibilities: signifiers are signs, perceptible signals of what can be done. Signifiers are of far more importance to designers than are affordances.” [Donald A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition, 2013, pXIV-XV]

junon 5y ago
TIL, thanks :) I've only ever had it used/explained in the manner my previous comment did. Always happy to be corrected there.