4 ms·
Those who brought out Champagne when Trump was censored... watch out... sooner or later, you'll be the one censored, and no one will be there to help you.
by icare_1er 5y ago
Those who brought out Champagne when Trump was censored... watch out... sooner or later, you'll be the one censored, and no one will be there to help you.
- valdiorn 5y agoIs this apt for the situation? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...
- jf22 5y agoThe slippery slope argument, which is already a logical fallacy, that digital censorship will lead to persecution is ridiculous.
- ghoward 5y agoThe slippery slope argument is not a fallacy if there's evidence for it, and in the case of censorship, there is.
- jf22 5y agoOk, has any group been persecuted?
- ghoward 5y agoThere's plenty of evidence from history that if a group is censored, it is persecuted thereafter. The evidence does not need to be from now.
- jf22 5y agoCould be specific which "group" this is?
- gavinhoward 5y agoJews (plenty of examples including the Holocaust). LGBT+ (unless you think that what happened to Alan Turing wasn't persecution). Muslims (by Christians and others). Christians (by Romans throwing them to the lions and others). If there is a group, chances are it's been censored and persecuted. I know that I'm supposed to assume the best, but with you it's pretty hard because history is so full of examples that it seems your question is not in good faith. I also wasn't talking about one specific group. I was talking about what history shows about what happens to a group after it is censored. That is why I said "a group" instead of "this group" or "that group".
- jf22 5y agoI mean which current group is being persecuted, not past groups.
- t43562 5y agoOn the whole I'd prefer to stay clear of any "help" from David Davis or Trump.
- archagon 5y agoNo, I really won't, because I don't flagrantly violate Twitter and Facebook ToS day to day.