I also said: > The only point at which a company cares about cheaters is when the community starts to really get riled up about them and revenue drops. My poi

I also said: > The only point at which a company cares about cheaters is when the community starts to really get riled up about them and revenue drops. My point is not contraindicated by Activision releasing new anti-cheat software a year and a half after a game came out. Activision likely saw falling player signups/playtime/cosmetics spending, did some surveys, and decided improving their anti-cheat was the way to go. > If you think there is a better solution to ban repeat bots and cheats please provide it or at least offer a creative response to what COD is trying. In another comment I pointed out that the games are full of cheaters so blatant their K/D ratios are better than the top pros in the game, sometimes by a factor of ten. It would be trivial for Activision to automatically ban them simply on that alone, or at least auto-flag them for a manual review. A K/D ratio of 1.0 is considered "good" for an average player. 2-3 would be world-class. The top player on one of the CoD:WZ trackers has a K/D ratio of twenty six.