> Mr Woodard had four devices fitted around his house, but his neighbour said that meant she was under constant surveillance. > At the end of a court hearing J

> Mr Woodard had four devices fitted around his house, but his neighbour said that meant she was under constant surveillance. > At the end of a court hearing Judge Melissa Clarke said Mr Woodard had breached the Data Protection Act 2018 and UK GDPR and said the images and video of Dr Fairhurst are her personal data. In the U.S. I assume that she would be considered to be out in public and could be legally surveilled by her neighbor.