4 ms·
> How many pilots would you need to see interviewed to determine there wasn't a sick-out? 1 SW pilot would be fine, not the association, not the union, not the
by hunterb123 5y ago
> How many pilots would you need to see interviewed to determine there wasn't a sick-out?
1 SW pilot would be fine, not the association, not the union, not the CEO. A SW pilot that was supposed to be working that day.
- zenithd 5y ago"If I can find EVEN ONE person who agrees with my politics and cares as little about the truth as I do, then I must be right" You're a dumbass and a hopeless cause. I sincerely hope I never have to work with you on a real problem in a real organization. Good night.
- dang 5y agoWe've banned this account for breaking the site guidelines. Please don't create accounts to do that with. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- ceejayoz 5y ago> A SW pilot that was supposed to be working that day. A single pilot claiming to have gone to work would be sufficient to disprove the sick-out? 1,000 out of about 3,000 flights got canceled on Sunday. I presume the remaining 2,000 were piloted; I don't know that an interview is necessary to demonstrate that. A single pilot claiming to have done a sick-out doesn't prove anything much, either. I can find a doctor that claims demon sperm causes gynecological issues (https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/report-texas-doctor-who-went-viral-with-unproven-covid-19-cure-believes-in-demon-sperm https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/report-texas-doctor-who-wen...), but that doesn't really lend it credence. The sick leave data seems a lot more compelling than digging up one interview, in either direction.