No. It is not worth noting any such thing. The need to keep nuclear in the short term is based solely on the urgency of the climate crisis. Cost is irrelevant

No. It is not worth noting any such thing. The need to keep nuclear in the short term is based solely on the urgency of the climate crisis. Cost is irrelevant in the face of extinction. We have a couple centuries to figure out wind and solar economics if we convert all coal and gas to nuclear immediately.