I think they actually align, read the actual executive order. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/14/2021-19927/requiring-coronavirus-disease-201

I think they actually align, read the actual executive order. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/14/2021-19927/requiring-coronavirus-disease-2019-vaccination-for-federal-employees https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/14/2021-19... Religious accommodations must be upheld (multiple federal judges are allowing this). Religious accommodations are really just an objection based on moral grounds. Saying “my body is my temple and I won’t put anything in it unless there are years of research” is valid by that standard. And thus far the courts have supported that. The Texas gov basically said you have to allow for objections under the law. Which in the US is very robust and prohibits things like discrimination. I view both mandates as not contradicting each other.