3 ms·
I don't think canceling an already tight military budget in favor of a power source that could be devastating when hit by an airstrike is a good strategy
by schleck8 5y ago
I don't think canceling an already tight military budget in favor of a power source that could be devastating when hit by an airstrike is a good strategy
- Ericson2314 5y agoit wouldn't be devastating
- schleck8 5y ago>A meltdown or explosion at a nuclear facility could cause a large amount of radioactive material to be released into the environment. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HEALTHYENVIRONMENTS/RADIATIONPROTECTION/EMERGENCYRESPONSE/Documents/radiologicalterrorism.pdf https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HEALTHYENVIRONMENTS/RADIATIONP...
- Ericson2314 5y agoIdeally with passive containment, anything that blows up the container/automatic-cooler, is also going to physically blow up / spread out the rods too? Big mess, sure, but no meltdown. Also remember war is really bad no matter what. If someone blow up all the powerplants regardless of sort, a huge portion of people will die simply because the lack of electricity.
- Factorium 5y agoRussia supplies 55% of Germany's natural gas imports. Cut that off and say goodbye to manufacturing, electricity, heating.