3 ms·

I agree the study they linked to is an unfortunate choice but I looked elsewhere for mortality numbers for myocarditis and they don't seem to be that far off [1

I agree the study they linked to is an unfortunate choice but I looked elsewhere for mortality numbers for myocarditis and they don't seem to be that far off [1]. In the end I also don't think this is a meaningful finding, but I do believe it is worth looking at the data at least a bit and not dismissing it out of hand because of the venue where it was published. It's good to keep an open mind. [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370379/#:~:text=Non%2Dfulminant%20active%20myocarditis%20has,9%E2%80%93%2011%2C%20e1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370379/#:~:tex...).

msrenee 5y ago
What I got from that study is that the prognosis for myocarditis is very dependent on the cause and how much damage happens before the cause is removed. I dismissed it initially due to the website it was on. Then I spent a good half hour digging through their arguments and finding out whether they had any basis in reality. Now I know for sure it has no real merit and I've wasted a decent amount of time on it. For a more extreme example, I'm not going to go through every blog post the KKK puts up just because they used some scientific-sounding arguments to argue that black people are bad. I get where people are coming from trying to consider all the data, but some sources aren't worth the effort.