Which is far cooler, and comes from a far more credible scientist, though as a notion, still requires low credence. Penrose has far more insight into the mathe

Which is far cooler, and comes from a far more credible scientist, though as a notion, still requires low credence. Penrose has far more insight into the mathematics of the beginning and ending of the universe than your average genius-cosmologist. Yet claims for supporting data from CMB analysis (residual cold-spots from black holes in past epochs) should have been confirmed by now. So far as I know, those results haven't been repeated and all occur within error margins.