> You belie this with your statement that any such skepticism is "bad faith". I really didn't, and I feel that you did not attempt to engage with a charitable

> You belie this with your statement that any such skepticism is "bad faith". I really didn't, and I feel that you did not attempt to engage with a charitable interpretation of my argument. I used climate change denial as an example, because there clearly are people that make those arguments in bad faith, for monetary compensation. The same was true during cigarette legislation. I made no all statement at any point. > Well, if you think YOU have a lock on what's true, and everyone with varying opinions is an obvious quack or a shill, then I think it's you who doesn't understand science. Dude are you arguing with me or a million other people?