3 ms·
Being anti-mask isn't "unauthentic or disingenuous skepticism". I've yet to hear a compelling argument why a fully vaccinated individual has any business wearin
by spookthesunset 5y ago
Being anti-mask isn't "unauthentic or disingenuous skepticism". I've yet to hear a compelling argument why a fully vaccinated individual has any business wearing a mask. I've also yet to see any real data that shows that most masks worn do anything beyond being a placebo.
All these studies conducted around masks are being done in the heat of the moment in a highly politically charged environment. Releasing a study that says masks don't work will get the authors labeled as "anti-science" and probably destroy their careers. All the studies performed prior to this mess were inconclusive, at best.
Just because you disagree with somebody doesn't make that person anti-science and doesn't make them dangerous, "disingenuous" or "unauthentic". People have plenty of good reasons to call BS on almost all of our mitigations.
- rabuse 5y agoThere is no compelling argument. They constantly keep shifting the goal posts whenever asked genuine questions. The definition of "vaccine" is even being redefined by a couple of these radical groups.