4 ms·
http://citizendium.org/ http://citizendium.org/ ?
by pb30 18y ago
http://citizendium.org/ http://citizendium.org/ ?
- rokhayakebe 18y agoMaybe, although they need to work on the UI. But good start.
- gojomo 18y agoThat's the wrong direction: more selective. The right direction: Wikipedia with a constitutional bias against deletionism. Only false, illegal, or privacy-violating information should be deleted. Everything true should be welcomed.
- hugh 18y agoSweet! You should start one of those. I look forward to creating the article "List of random numbers generated by hugh's random number generator on September 18, 2008".
- gojomo 18y agoAt some point, an excessive contributor would have to sponsor their own material. It's a business model!
- rsheridan6 18y agoThat would be a useless article, but it would be harmless, assuming a sane policy that doesn't allow for terabyte-long articles that strain server resources. Nobody would link to it and nobody would read it, even if your really posted it - which you wouldn't, because you have better things to do.
- william42 18y agoI look forward to watching it turn into the 4chan wiki.