This will be harsh. I don't sugar-coat. The assumption is that as a design firm, your website should advertise the designs you would make. And yet none of th

This will be harsh. I don't sugar-coat. The assumption is that as a design firm, your website should advertise the designs you would make. And yet none of the rotating backgrounds you have are anything I would like to see on any site except Flickr. Neither do they maintain a consistent theme, since one is, confusingly enough, a bunch of circles, and one is clearly not a photo given how it tapers off on the left and right. Furthermore, on many of the backgrounds you choose, the bottom bar is unreadable --- it doesn't even half-ass it by making it opaque and white when you mouse over. Presumably you'd at least choose the backgrounds well. The backgrounds also mean that the site takes a while to load (and this is with great internet), so the site looks bad for two or three seconds. The focal point of the site is presumably the subscribe button and entry field. Yet these are gray and, worse, the subscribe button doesn't even match height with the entry field, which looks amateurish and ugly. I'm on Chrome 14 on Arch Linux. The backgrounds have a light grid overlaid upon them. This might make sense for some of the backgrounds, but is silly for the circles one, and at the very least looks like you're going for flair with no reason. Again, amateurish. I'm not sure the blue you use for the percent complete bar matches any of the backgrounds. The facebook and google+ buttons do nothing (but maybe you know that). Sorry to be harsh, again.