We mandate lots of those too, since statistics says it is a good idea So I’d ask the reverse question: if the risk reduction is scientifically demonstrated and

We mandate lots of those too, since statistics says it is a good idea So I’d ask the reverse question: if the risk reduction is scientifically demonstrated and quite clear, what responsibility do public officials have towards enforcing the safety of others? When should we let them take that right, and when should we refuse them that power? I won’t claim to know this answer either!