3 ms·
We could probably list a thousand things that you could do now to reduce your risks of something. The question is around a mandate, and if the risk reduction i
by colordrops 5y ago
We could probably list a thousand things that you could do now to reduce your risks of something. The question is around a mandate, and if the risk reduction is marginal or diminishingly small, why would you mandate it? That's the whole point of this thread.
- manwe150 5y agoWe mandate lots of those too, since statistics says it is a good idea So I’d ask the reverse question: if the risk reduction is scientifically demonstrated and quite clear, what responsibility do public officials have towards enforcing the safety of others? When should we let them take that right, and when should we refuse them that power? I won’t claim to know this answer either!