3 ms·
The article says the QR check-in in the neighbouring state of Victoria works offline, but it didn't for me a couple of months ago when I lost 4G signal. Perhaps
by SulphurCrested 5y ago
The article says the QR check-in in the neighbouring state of Victoria works offline, but it didn't for me a couple of months ago when I lost 4G signal. Perhaps it's been changed since then – one would hope so, given the existence of mobile blackspots in rural Victoria.
However, the way the codes are used in Victoria is different, which means the size of the QR code doesn't matter much. (They tend to be about 1/4 of an A4 sheet, so larger than in NSW.) No-one is checking your phone to ensure you checked in; rather, it's an honesty system. So the codes are generally in the window near the door, and you stand off to one side. In those circumstances, if the code were larger and you could stand farther away, it would actually be less safe because it might encourage more than one at a time to use the code. As it is, a queue forms with polite distancing, like an ATM. (Remember those, and cash?)
We also have QR codes at every tram and bus stop in Victoria, as laminated A4, so they definitely do need to work outside. I haven't used those, but ones in shop windows work fine when it's raining. The only problem I ever encountered was a QR code on a bendy laminated piece of A4 indoors, under coloured lighting.
Vaccination status is integrated with the Victorian app, because it was that state that was tasked to work with the Federal government to implement and (together with the NT and Tasmania) test that. It is currently undergoing testing in rural Victoria, although anyone in the state can load their Federally-issued vaccination certificate into the app. NSW have not yet taken the code and put it in their app, probably because the people doing that expected the restrictions to be eased on the original timetable.
While loading the certificate into the apps should be technically simple, it isn't, because of 1980s Federal laws to do with sharing of medical data. (They know my phone number, Victoria knows it, but it is against the law to match it. I must log in to the Federal site or the Federal app on my phone and authorise it to copy the certificate into the state app, and I must keep doing it every few months.)
- WatchDog 5y agoThe Victorian ones are way worse, they contain a massive JWT blob, with a 512 byte signature, really difficult to scan on a lot of phones.
- dbaupp 5y agoYeah, the JWT is huge, and contains a bunch of unnecessary data, even ignoring the huge signature (132 bytes, I think?). It even uses error correction M, down from NSW’s H or the article’s Q. It looks like they still end up as version 18 despite that. That said, it seems like there’s two versions of the Victorian codes. I can find others online that have a base64 snippet containing: { "t":1, "lid":"<base64'd 64-byte ID>", "ln":"<name here> (Yes, seemingly without the trailing "}, as a microoptimisation?) This uses error correction M, and ends up as a version 12 code. I don't know for sure which codes are 'current' but I suspect the JWT ones are the older ones, based on https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/victoria-s-qr-codes-badly-made-developers-say-20210617-p581r6.html https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/victoria-s-qr-co...
- dbaupp 5y ago(For offline check-ins, that was my mistake even for NSW: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28846384 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28846384 ) I suspect having larger codes makes a big difference to the experience. It does seem like the Victorian ones are more like 15% of the page area, rather than 5% for NSW. Vaccination status and so on is a whole other can of worms beyond how the QR codes work and could be better.