OK, downvoted. The point of my comment was not that software cannot be aligned or co-located with hardware. As others pointed out C/C++ is just as capable. My p

OK, downvoted. The point of my comment was not that software cannot be aligned or co-located with hardware. As others pointed out C/C++ is just as capable. My point was that spending the first 75% of the video recounting H/W advances which is based in formal science (chem-eng and the rest) is orthogonal to software. Moore's law does not carry over into software. The video could have just started by pointing out with H/W specialization there are more places to put Rust code. This way 99% of the video could have been on the OP's like of Rust. Right? The top comment shares much the same sentiment: "Skip towards the end and Cantrill..."