3 ms·
...depending on your legal department, it might be to ward off out of geo liabilities or expectations of support (whether actual or simply perceived).
by zeruch 5y ago
...depending on your legal department, it might be to ward off out of geo liabilities or expectations of support (whether actual or simply perceived).
- chuckee 5y agoI've never heard of a company being held liable for releasing even a paid product with defective security, let alone a free one. They're not even held liable for deliberately including spyware [1]! That any lawyer would believe a company would be held liable for releasing an imperfect security patch is beyond absurd, and nothing more than a convenient excuse for abusive practices. [1] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/11/lg-smart-tv-snooping-extends-to-home-networks-second-blogger-says/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/11/lg-sm...