Heh, I like the first absolute rule. It's obviously in response to the ID/'evolution' debate, and consequently says absolutely nothing since neither side argue

Heh, I like the first absolute rule. It's obviously in response to the ID/'evolution' debate, and consequently says absolutely nothing since neither side argues evolution (broadly defined as change of species over time) doesn't happen. The only argument is about what mechanisms can be considered scientific explanations. If you don't believe me, read what the key ID thinkers actually say, instead of what the media says they say. The ID people explicitly make this point in Expelled. So, even though Matt picks out this position to show his clear thinking skills in a controversial matter, it doesn't really pick out a controversial position. Matt's position on evolution is just empty rhetoric for those who don't know the debate. Alternatively, Matt doesn't get it either.