4 ms·
ridiculous policy. Nice photograph in the article, by the detained photographer. Thus it apparently it has "esthetic value", so the officer erred in detaining
by molecule 15y ago
ridiculous policy.
Nice photograph in the article, by the detained photographer. Thus it apparently it has "esthetic value", so the officer erred in detaining the photographer.
- mc32 15y agoExcept he wasn't detained.
- molecule 15y agofrom the article: "...was detained by Officer Asif Kahn for taking pictures..."
- chc 15y agohttp://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2884313 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2884313 He was detained only in the very casual sense of being stopped to ask a question ("Sorry I'm late; I was detained outside"). He was not brought into custody, which is the usual sense in which people are said to be detained by the police.
- molecule 15y agoyes, but this semantic axe grinding misses point of the initial comment: LBPD policy: "if x: then y;" Report: "not x; then y!"
- chc 15y agoYour algorithm has an error that renders it unexecutable on existing hardware. Here's a corrected version, which appears to be the one the police are using based on their statements: LBPD policy: "if apparently x: then y" Report: "apparently (but not actually) x; y" If have the ability to upgrade police officers with psychic powers, I'm sure they'll be happy to switch to your fork.