3 ms·

Oops! Yep, looks like I mis-entered the URL and can't seem to edit. =/

• dang 5y ago
  No, you entered it fine, but our software has recently begun rewriting URLs to the canonical URL if the page has one, and this page has //actu.epfl.ch/news/scientists-discover-a-highly-potent-antibody-again/ ...which isn't valid, but we might as well tweak the code to handle such cases. In the meantime I've restored the URL. Sorry for the error!
  • mircea 5y ago
    That's a valid URL, AFAICT. https://www.paulirish.com/2010/the-protocol-relative-url/ https://www.paulirish.com/2010/the-protocol-relative-url/
    • dang 5y ago
      Whoa! TIL Edit: fixed now. Thanks you guys.
      • mircea 5y ago
        Glad I could contribute something :)
  • pvg 5y ago
    As the other comment says, it's a valid URL but to really rub it in, the canonical link RFC (6596) says it's valid and then also uses a relative URL in an example like they were just waiting for someone to be wrong about this on the internet.