I would look at the broader context. Is someone using this point to include changes to forest management as part of a wider climate change solution? Or are th

I would look at the broader context. Is someone using this point to include changes to forest management as part of a wider climate change solution? Or are they using it as a derailing tactic to take no action on climate change OR on forest fire management? Because I find that this subject is a talking point used to justify inaction of any kind, not just the kind being disputed.