4 ms·
Does your $250/mo include all the ops cost of other solutions?
by count 5y ago
Does your $250/mo include all the ops cost of other solutions?
- VWWHFSfQ 5y agoYes it does
- slownews45 5y agoYou should look at offering this as a service perhaps. 2,500 250MB lambdas for $250/month with all AWS guarantees (ie, Multi-AZ, permissioning on every call etc etc) would be pretty compelling I think for folks running intermediate lambda workloads (ie, 5-10K lambadas at a time).
- VWWHFSfQ 5y agoI'm not trying to offer it as a service. I'm trying to run my workload in a way that can scale from 0 -> 10,000 request/second in an instant and doesn't cost my company $5,000/month to do so. It's pretty easy if you know what you're doing (or care to figure it out).
- slownews45 5y agoIf you can do $250/month with all ops costs and features of lambda for 5,000 or 10,000 requests per second - you would be silly not to offer a service. There are plenty of us who can run a system that scales to 10krps. That's relatively easy? I personally can't stand lambda and don't use it FWIW. I like EC2, I actually like fargate a lot of all sorts of things including lambda like services without a separate lambda for each request. But for folks with a payload, that want the lambda like experience - if you have a solution, all ops cost included (ie, no well paid developer or ops person needed for customer) for $250/month for the scale we are talking here (2,500 x 250MB = 625GB etc) then you have an amazing solution going especially if you can do the networking, IAM controls etc that aws provides. The problem I've seen, when folks say amazon is "insanely expensive" they are usually not actually comparing the AWS offering to a similar offering. If your cheap solution is not lambda like, you need to compare to EC2 or similar (with perhaps a good programmer doing something a bit more monolithic than aws).
- count 5y agoYou could make a fortune selling that by itself, unless your ops cost is just yolo provisioning and never doing backups/patching/etc.
- VWWHFSfQ 5y agoI'll never understand how we got to this point of learned helplessness where people think hosted services like Lambda are the only ones capable of being secure and robust. It's madness..
- count 5y agoThat's not what I said or implied.
- VWWHFSfQ 5y agoI'm not sure what you're trying to say then. > your ops cost is just yolo provisioning and never doing backups/patching. You think Amazon is the only one capable of doing backups and keeping software up to date?
- count 5y agoNo, but I think that it's super common to discount to $0 all the work that using lambda saves you from maintenance and operations. And if you can do any of that at scale for $250/mo you're lightyears ahead of nearly everyone.