4 ms·
Nature Communications is not Nature. But whatever.
by thisnormaluser 5y ago
Nature Communications is not Nature. But whatever.
- chaxor 5y agoI actually have a preference towards Nature Communications over Nature, as Nature Communications actually allows more pages for explanation and as such typically has more rigorous research. On the flip side, Nature often has bolder claims with less convincing evidence, which often reads similar to pop-sci articles.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- charleshmartin 5y agoThat's fine. Here's a few of my online talks: UC Berkeley / ICSI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zgul4oygMc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zgul4oygMc Stanford ICME: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQUItQi-B-I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQUItQi-B-I and a couple of Mikes's Institute for Pure & Applied Mathematics (IPAM) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmVuNRKsQa8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmVuNRKsQa8 Physics Informed Machine Learning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXhwLtjtUsI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXhwLtjtUsI and our KDD workshop KDD: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3292500.3332294 https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3292500.3332294 many more talks and papers available And my favorite, a podcast that has featured LeCun himself: https://blog.rebellionresearch.com/blog/theoretical-physicist-dr-charles-martin-on-deep-learning https://blog.rebellionresearch.com/blog/theoretical-physicis...
- charleshmartin 5y agoOh and here's a 2 hour deep dive into the theory https://bluejeans.com/playback/s/cyQnC9EZZSB9HlHDjB1Zpu3fs0J71i4kPqN3ewCzbLm5AxKQzJ12gqwteONlsEtM https://bluejeans.com/playback/s/cyQnC9EZZSB9HlHDjB1Zpu3fs0J...