2 ms·

Yes, certainly. For example, VAERS has been sending a huge, clear, obvious signal since January of this year that the vaccines are too unsafe to proceed with th

Yes, certainly. For example, VAERS has been sending a huge, clear, obvious signal since January of this year that the vaccines are too unsafe to proceed with them. MSM never mentions it except to stonewall. Here's the best summary of the situation I know of: https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeuti... (If you don't have time to watch a video, there are slides.) Maybe someone might suggest that isn't a coverup, that it's just ignorance. Well, it can't be ignorance in the case of the freedom marches with huge crowds that have been occurring all over the world. IIRC people in France marched for the 13th straight weekend. But MSM outlets are seemingly unable to detect any of it.

mousepilot 5y ago
I've had plenty of flu shots and never got a VAERS handout but I got a handout for the covid shot, I'm betting VAERS saw lots of use with the covid shot that wasn't common with other vaccines, so that has to influence the numbers. From a gov't website: "A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given." I guess if you see more coverups than the average person does then you'll probably form different opinions than the average person. Also, the "freedom marches" include many Q types I'm sure, and if folks think the Q types are reasonable people, well you know...