3 ms·

The news itself is less noteworthy (we've known this for a long time), than the fact that the NY Times would be willing to publish such a thing.

WalterGR 5y ago
Is NYT part of a COVID coverup?
- HamburgerEmoji 5y ago
  Yes, certainly. For example, VAERS has been sending a huge, clear, obvious signal since January of this year that the vaccines are too unsafe to proceed with them. MSM never mentions it except to stonewall. Here's the best summary of the situation I know of: https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeuti... (If you don't have time to watch a video, there are slides.) Maybe someone might suggest that isn't a coverup, that it's just ignorance. Well, it can't be ignorance in the case of the freedom marches with huge crowds that have been occurring all over the world. IIRC people in France marched for the 13th straight weekend. But MSM outlets are seemingly unable to detect any of it.
  - mousepilot 5y ago
    I've had plenty of flu shots and never got a VAERS handout but I got a handout for the covid shot, I'm betting VAERS saw lots of use with the covid shot that wasn't common with other vaccines, so that has to influence the numbers. From a gov't website: "A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given." I guess if you see more coverups than the average person does then you'll probably form different opinions than the average person. Also, the "freedom marches" include many Q types I'm sure, and if folks think the Q types are reasonable people, well you know...
- rossdavidh 5y ago
  I don't know that it's a "coverup", and I happily got vaccinated. But NYT has had a bit of an hysterical "it's totally safe and everyone needs it and if you think otherwise you're an idiot" kick throughout the pandemic. The idea that children, or people who've already had it and recovered, might have a different tradeoff than people like me, is a subtlety they haven't been very willing to discuss. Until now, I guess, which is a good sign!

WalterGR 5y ago

Is NYT part of a COVID coverup?

HamburgerEmoji 5y ago
Yes, certainly. For example, VAERS has been sending a huge, clear, obvious signal since January of this year that the vaccines are too unsafe to proceed with them. MSM never mentions it except to stonewall. Here's the best summary of the situation I know of: https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeuti... (If you don't have time to watch a video, there are slides.) Maybe someone might suggest that isn't a coverup, that it's just ignorance. Well, it can't be ignorance in the case of the freedom marches with huge crowds that have been occurring all over the world. IIRC people in France marched for the 13th straight weekend. But MSM outlets are seemingly unable to detect any of it.
- mousepilot 5y ago
  I've had plenty of flu shots and never got a VAERS handout but I got a handout for the covid shot, I'm betting VAERS saw lots of use with the covid shot that wasn't common with other vaccines, so that has to influence the numbers. From a gov't website: "A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given." I guess if you see more coverups than the average person does then you'll probably form different opinions than the average person. Also, the "freedom marches" include many Q types I'm sure, and if folks think the Q types are reasonable people, well you know...
rossdavidh 5y ago
I don't know that it's a "coverup", and I happily got vaccinated. But NYT has had a bit of an hysterical "it's totally safe and everyone needs it and if you think otherwise you're an idiot" kick throughout the pandemic. The idea that children, or people who've already had it and recovered, might have a different tradeoff than people like me, is a subtlety they haven't been very willing to discuss. Until now, I guess, which is a good sign!