3 ms·
No, I meant exactly what I said. It would have been one thing if he simply fathered Pakistans own program; while that might have raised eyebrows in Capitol Hill
by zeruch 5y ago
No, I meant exactly what I said. It would have been one thing if he simply fathered Pakistans own program; while that might have raised eyebrows in Capitol Hill here in the US, it would not have fallen terribly outside expectations of security elites in Asia as well as the EU and US. When he started playing footsie with DPRK and others akin, it most definitely was a wretched move.
Pakistanis can love him as a hero...there are people in the US who still worship Robert E. Lee, and they are idiots also.
- vimacs2 5y agoExcept the difference is the Americans never had to deal with a hostile next door neighbour with the personal financial and arms backing of the world's largest military superpower so this is a laughable attempt at equivocation. You might not like the DPRK (I'm not a fan either though then again it's hard to have a firm stance on an area in the world where there is almost no non-propagandised information on) but it makes a lot of sense why somebody from Pakistan of all places would be sympathetic with their situation.