I don't think this is really true if we apply an example: - We need a way to travel faster and I've made a car to do that - cars spread in adoption - travel

I don't think this is really true if we apply an example: - We need a way to travel faster and I've made a car to do that - cars spread in adoption - travel is much easier - people now use cars without knowing why I can't think of many solutions where we don't also have the original problem it solves? The real problem is people do not have enough knowledge in a domain to infer whether a new proposed solution is better or not. So to take the example further: - Cars should no longer be used because they are causing climate change - People fight against it because they do not have the knowledge to infer the right decision - Person takes a decade or longer proving out why they are right - new normal is adopted