3 ms·

I do photogrammetry. That's one use that will max out the entire system (not just the graphics card) for hours on end that has nothing to do with games or cc's.

• salawat 5y ago
  What in particular are you doing with it? I have the feeling my question may be a bit light on details for you to be able to formulate a great answer, but are you doing things like doing test renderings of an interpolated viewpoint given multiple integrated perspectives? Edge detections? Object "identity" detection (x, y, z) object in perspective W is (a, b, c) in perspective D? That sort of thing? I could see how that could end up getting very computation intensive very quickly! Building up the 3-D space, tagging spots where the math doesn't quite work out... Compensating for different lighting conditions from different pictures at different angles to get just the info you're looking for! Or am I completely off base?
  • junon 5y ago
    There are programs that do all of this for you. I just take the photos and use the models in other things.
• noobermin 5y ago
  600W worth of photogrammetry?
  • junon 5y ago
    If I don't want to wait for 200 hours at a time, yes sure.
  • lm28469 5y ago
    Whatever your problem is if it's remotely calculation heavy you can draw as much power as the hardware will let you (if the software handles it)
  • jacquesm 5y ago
    You ask a question, you get an answer and then you doubt the answer. That's not nice.
    • burnished 5y ago
      Its also an invitation to brag about their work! Its an incredible claim with a factual answer, its rare you get to show off about your niche like that right?
  • LegitShady 5y ago
    If you're doing it for work, the faster it goes the more money you make. So its not a question of 600w of photogrammetry, but 'how fast can we make it' and the resulting electrical load.
  • nuerow 5y ago
    > 600W worth of photogrammetry? Yes, no doubt. Specially nowadays when point clouds are all the rage.