3 ms·

Might be this: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-23/how-will-south-australias-home-quarantine-trial-work/100398878 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-23/how

by k1t 5y ago

Might be this: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-23/how-will-south-australias-home-quarantine-trial-work/100398878 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-23/how-will-south-austra... https://katv.com/news/coronavirus/new-program-tracks-quarantining-australians-via-app-requires-selfies-for-proof https://katv.com/news/coronavirus/new-program-tracks-quarant... [Home quarantining] participants will receive advice via the smartphone app as to their obligation at random times to provide the selfie back to the public health teams. Should that not be responded to in a period of time, follow up calls or visits are made so as to make sure that the person is where they should be,” Foley explained.

na85 5y ago
That's heinous.
- javagram 5y ago
  Seems less heinous than spreading a dangerous virus and killing hundreds or thousands of citizens? We’ve seen other countries try that approach (e.g. here in the USA) and it clearly harms society and has led to massive suffering and loss of life. Considering this is being trialed as an alternative to being locked under guard in a hotel or cabin for two weeks, it’s actually less invasive too…
  - randomhodler84 5y ago
    And this is the problem with slippery slopes. I find the facial recognition gps tracking apps to be horribly intrusive and not a good alternative to being locked up in a hotel, which is also awful. They always pull this crap, and society ends up accepting the lesser of two evils. Like the meme, always has been.
    - javagram 5y ago
      Centuries ago, people had to be locked up for 40 or 50 days on a small ship (the original “quarantine”) to prevent spreading disease before they’d be allowed in. Modern technology reducing it to 14 days and a few photos in the comfort of your home seems an improvement, not a slippery slope.
    - deleted 5y ago
      [deleted]
  - BuyMyBitcoins 5y ago
    That’s a horrible way to look at it. There are so many alternative ways to enforce a quarantine / lockdown without having to resort to such invasive things. If you use the justification of “harming society” and “massive suffering and loss of life” you can justify way more than just fighting COVID-19. Slippery slope aside, why can’t the government merely enforce the curfew by telling citizens not to leave their homes instead of forcing them to take selfies at random intervals? If you don’t comply they send the police to your home. If you don’t comply out of protest, they’ll jail you for your safety, where you’re more likely to catch the disease they’re trying to keep you from catching. Pure insanity.
  - na85 5y ago
    >Seems less heinous than spreading a dangerous virus and killing hundreds or thousands of citizens? Since when is the choice between "in-home photo surveillance" and "intentionally spreading COVID"?
    - javagram 5y ago
      Since that’s not the choice: people will spread covid whether “intentionally” or not without a strong border control and quarantine system. Almost every country was hit hard by covid except those who stopped it at the border.

by k1t 5y ago

na85 5y ago

That's heinous.

javagram 5y ago
Seems less heinous than spreading a dangerous virus and killing hundreds or thousands of citizens? We’ve seen other countries try that approach (e.g. here in the USA) and it clearly harms society and has led to massive suffering and loss of life. Considering this is being trialed as an alternative to being locked under guard in a hotel or cabin for two weeks, it’s actually less invasive too…
- randomhodler84 5y ago
  And this is the problem with slippery slopes. I find the facial recognition gps tracking apps to be horribly intrusive and not a good alternative to being locked up in a hotel, which is also awful. They always pull this crap, and society ends up accepting the lesser of two evils. Like the meme, always has been.
  - javagram 5y ago
    Centuries ago, people had to be locked up for 40 or 50 days on a small ship (the original “quarantine”) to prevent spreading disease before they’d be allowed in. Modern technology reducing it to 14 days and a few photos in the comfort of your home seems an improvement, not a slippery slope.
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
- BuyMyBitcoins 5y ago
  That’s a horrible way to look at it. There are so many alternative ways to enforce a quarantine / lockdown without having to resort to such invasive things. If you use the justification of “harming society” and “massive suffering and loss of life” you can justify way more than just fighting COVID-19. Slippery slope aside, why can’t the government merely enforce the curfew by telling citizens not to leave their homes instead of forcing them to take selfies at random intervals? If you don’t comply they send the police to your home. If you don’t comply out of protest, they’ll jail you for your safety, where you’re more likely to catch the disease they’re trying to keep you from catching. Pure insanity.
- na85 5y ago
  >Seems less heinous than spreading a dangerous virus and killing hundreds or thousands of citizens? Since when is the choice between "in-home photo surveillance" and "intentionally spreading COVID"?
  - javagram 5y ago
    Since that’s not the choice: people will spread covid whether “intentionally” or not without a strong border control and quarantine system. Almost every country was hit hard by covid except those who stopped it at the border.