> but you're misrepresenting him by leaving the preceding two lines out. That was the only place where he compared PAIP and AIMA. I guess he considers these bo

> but you're misrepresenting him by leaving the preceding two lines out. That was the only place where he compared PAIP and AIMA. I guess he considers these books serving purposes different enough so comparisons in other areas have less sense. Back to where we started, PAIP isn't universally considered a better book, even though it's good.