4 ms·
I think you meant acronym? Either way, this is an irrelevant comment to make.
by bigsausagepizza 5y ago
I think you meant acronym? Either way, this is an irrelevant comment to make.
- tom_ 5y agoAdjective, apparently: https://twitter.com/lego_group/status/842115345280294912 https://twitter.com/lego_group/status/842115345280294912
- OJFord 5y agoThe unfortunate thing about that is that it's wrong. I don't mean the usage, I'm British so I'm firmly 'lots of Lego', but it's obviously a noun. Using it to describe a brick etc. doesn't preclude that. (It's 'attributive', or 'adjunct'.)
- mekkkkkk 5y agoIs "SQL" in "SQL server" also a noun? Not trying to argue one way or the other, I honestly don't know (non-native english speaker).
- dragonwriter 5y agoIn “SQL Server”, “SQL” functions as an adjective modifying “Server”; its not unusual for what are normally nouns to do that, distinguished only by position(e.g , “hat” in “hat rack”.)
- mekkkkkk 5y agoSo when the LEGO™®© folk are arguing that "LEGO is always an adjective", they might mean that using it as an adjective noun is the correct thing to do, rather than claiming that "LEGO" by itself is an adjective? I suppose that since "LEGO" is the name of a real concept (the LEGO system) it's unavoidably a noun in essence.
- OJFord 5y agoWikipedia says [0] 'adjectival noun' was 'formerly synonymous, but now usually means an adjective used as a noun'. Regardless, it's not an adjective, much less 'always' - it's always a noun; sometimes used attributively ('adjectivally' if you like) / as a noun adjunct, such as in 'Lego bricks'. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noun_adjunct#Related_concepts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noun_adjunct#Related_concepts
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]