4 ms·
Personally I'd like the exact opposite. The people who post every day, I'm not really missing much if I don't see their latest posts. But the friend who posts o
by Androider 5y ago
Personally I'd like the exact opposite. The people who post every day, I'm not really missing much if I don't see their latest posts. But the friend who posts once a year? I want to see that post, even if it's from a while ago already and I haven't logged in since.
- kaiwen1 5y agoI want to receive no communication from many of my friends and extended family for months, and sometimes years, and then, when I do receive something, I want it to be real and thoughtful and written to me personally, not to a distribution. I want to respond at my leisure to these people in the same way, with no expectation of immediacy. There is often more joy in long absence, and finally reconnecting, than there is constantly being connected. And less pressure. The days of very expensive long-distance phone calls and cheap stamps were great.
- beamatronic 5y agoI want less of a social network and more of a time series database
- jaredsohn 5y agoAgree, although this might have the effect of scaring someone from posting again after a long while.
- jimkleiber 5y agoI would love this. I think it better replicates how in-person group discussions work. I remember being at a workshop and we sat in small group discussions. There was one person there who was the leader of a famous org in the space, much higher org status than all of us there. He spoke very rarely, and when he did, he used few words. I really paid attention when he spoke. That person on FB, Twitter, IG, and others would probably not even make a tiny ripple in the ocean of noise.
- hammyhavoc 5y agoIf the user worked with a famous org then they may be verified, ergo the algorithm would weight their content differently.
- jimkleiber 5y agoFair point, I didn't think of that.