4 ms·
That literally flies in the face of the first amendment. Forcing a website to host something they don’t like is compelled speech. They’re private corporations a
by colejohnson66 5y ago
That literally flies in the face of the first amendment. Forcing a website to host something they don’t like is compelled speech. They’re private corporations and can do what they want. The courts are very clear on that. If you want them to be forced to host everyone, you nationalize them into a utility.
- ars 5y agoThat's what a common carrier is. It's not such a stretch to apply that to general purpose hosts. And if what you say is right, how can the parent propose requiring banks to process any legal transaction?