4 ms·
It really annoys me how far into an article you have to read before it becomes clear that they're only telling one, disputed side of the story. > The US Army t
by c3534l 5y ago
It really annoys me how far into an article you have to read before it becomes clear that they're only telling one, disputed side of the story.
> The US Army takes the safety of its operations extremely seriously. Calls for a cease buzzer are taken seriously and range control has not denied or ignored any cease buzzers.
- andrepew 5y agoThe US Army and the FAA are two separate entities. The example in the article mentioned that a FAA facility manager might have denied escalation to use the buzzer, not the US Army.
- RattleyCooper 5y agoI mean, the article is very clear that it's on-site management that are not allowing controllers to do their job; nowhere in the article do they suggest that the US Army doesn't take it seriously.
- EastOfTruth 5y ago"[The] facility manager on duty later informed me we can't ask them to 'stop buzzer' and to just keep putting aircraft on headings,"