3 ms·

Since we're refraining from flaming the wiki wackos on wikipedia let's do it here instead: Get a frigging grip on reality. That page is not that bad. It is usef

by snorkel 18y ago

Since we're refraining from flaming the wiki wackos on wikipedia let's do it here instead: Get a frigging grip on reality. That page is not that bad. It is useful information. Deleting should be reserved for obvious spam or completely irrelevent or wrong information. But that's fine. The wikieaucracy is gradually destroying wikipedia paving the way for something better to take its place.

ciscoriordan 18y ago
There's something seriously wrong when the article about Disqus is deleted for not having reliable sources, and a search on Google News for "Disqus" shows articles from the Washington Post, CNET News, Mashable, and VentureBeat, all on the first page.
- wmf 18y ago
  Were those sources actually linked from the Disqus article?
  - pb30 18y ago
    No, the old article was pretty weak, just a couple of lines and a link to the TechCrunch launch post.
pb30 18y ago
Their point of view: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deletionism#Rationale_for_deletionism http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deletionism#Rationale_for_del...