3 ms·
So where were the males? Embarrassingly, Darwin had nearly thrown them away. He’d been finding little tick-like things attached to Ms. Arthrobalanus—parasites,
by hirundo 5y ago
So where were the males? Embarrassingly, Darwin had nearly thrown them away. He’d been finding little tick-like things attached to Ms. Arthrobalanus—parasites, he assumed. So he picked them off. In reality, these “ticks” were the menfolk. They were ten times smaller than the females and consisted of nothing but sacs of sperms. All other body parts on the males, such as stomachs and heads, had been whittled away by evolution.
How can demands for equality between the sexes in general be justified when gross inequalities can be such useful fitness strategies? If our species were made more fit by men evolving into small sacks that women attach to themselves like jewelry, then that practice would be both unequal and ethical.
- ceejayoz 5y agoBecause we're not barnacles?
- javert 5y agoDemands for equality between the sexes are justified because people of both sexes want more equality in order to improve their own personal lives. The justification never was "fitness of the species." I believe that would be a terrible goal. My belief happens to reflect the global consensus in the current era. This was one of the (many) issues behind World War II. Although I don't think even the Nazis truly believed in maximizing the fitness of the species. I think it was an excuse.