> UN system has proceeded to flesh out Which are result of spectrum of efforts spearheaded by LIO bloc post "end of history" to depart from status quo, that no

> UN system has proceeded to flesh out Which are result of spectrum of efforts spearheaded by LIO bloc post "end of history" to depart from status quo, that non LIO bloc others have actively defended against. Hence you have non LIO blocs rejecting western NGO consultative status and human rights committees, and in this case wikipedia at WIPO because those are tools weaponized by LIO powers to undermine Westphalian sovereignty. Currently, LIO takeover has stalled thanks to ascending PRC and other non LIO powers learning to outgame the west. Itself met with efforts Trump undermining or stalling these institutions in response. But Wesphalianism is still at the heart of the current order, which many in LIO wants to scrap/reform because it no longer disproportionate represents LIO interests, along with exasperated cries that UN is worthless simply because it now represents more global voices and interests. But until those reforms or replacement occurres, the westphalian framework at UN is still what the global community operates around. E: account throttled for posting too fast LIO functionally cannot be global organizing principle by virtue of excluding non LIO countries which is vast plurality of current nations. It's a club based off exclusivity not cooperation. Westphalian sovereignty has criticisms and challenges but it's also the minimum standard endorsed by most countries. LIO already has offshoots from global order and operate as a fragments of various multi/mini lateral frame works but it's not replacement for UN where principle of non-interference is still basis for international relations.