There's a difference between "influence" and "bad influence", and between "influence" and "running it into the ground". The union quite reasonably objects to c

There's a difference between "influence" and "bad influence", and between "influence" and "running it into the ground". The union quite reasonably objects to cutting 120,000, because there's no need to. The postal service could be quite solvent if Congress -- which is not the union and not, so far as I know, acting at the union's behest -- would take away the idiotic mandate to fund 75 years worth of benefits. In other words, this is something the union should oppose.