>1. We have all kinds of things we apply to children we do not to adults. They are children after all. For example kids are banned from smoking, but adults can.

>1. We have all kinds of things we apply to children we do not to adults. They are children after all. For example kids are banned from smoking, but adults can. So the government is allowed to be "your master, your parent, or king" of children but not for adults? Be consistent. >2. It only applies if attend a public school, parents can opt out by sending their child to a religious school, private school, or home school. What's the argument here? If you don't want to get vaxxed, then don't use public resources. Not sure how this is a flawed argument. >3. You assume people that oppose government mandates for COVID support government mandates for children. Anyone who is 100% ok with mandating vaccines for children but not for adults is simply not being logically consistent. This is the same "point" as (1). >do you believe the government is your master, your parent, or king. Or do you believe in personal freedom and autonomy I'm sorry, you are right. I forgot that America was anarchist state. I hope you will join me in fighting for me rights to operate my vehicle whenever I want. Why should the government tell me I'm not allowed to drive when I've had a couple beers? Is the government my parent? I know I can drive well when drunk and the other guys who have killed others were just idiots. Why does the government infringe on my autonomy to drive by forcing me to get a license? Why do I have to be put into a government database? I paid for my car after all. What's next? Will Biden require me to get a license to operate my toaster?