3 ms·

You'll need to include the expected payout of any defined benefit retirement plan as well to improve the quality of your comparison. And working after hours /

by kyleee 5y ago

You'll need to include the expected payout of any defined benefit retirement plan as well to improve the quality of your comparison. And working after hours / weekends is highly dependent on intrinsic motivation of the individual teacher. Many lower quality teachers successfully avoid much or all of that unpaid work, especially in situations where they have strong job protections (tenure)

bsanr 5y ago
This is goalpoast-moving. You should include the average payout of retirement planning in the private sector, for comparison. I will be shocked if we find a substantial difference, or advantage to the teachers. >Many lower quality teachers successfully avoid much or all of that unpaid work, especially in situations where they have strong job protections (tenure) We'll need citation for this too.
- kyleee 5y ago
  It's just part of the total comp calculation so it's a no-brainer to include in a good comparison. And defined benefit plans are quite desireable and becoming rarer, and have tended to be more stable in the case of market downturns. On the citation question, I don't have more to provide than experience from relatives who are teachers. It's quite well known that many bad teachers are quite entrenched, and those that realize their level of employment protection thread a good needle in terms of avoiding unpaid labor. It just requires caring about the job and results less, and many situations can push teachers towards feeling this way such as burnout (which can come from earnestly trying too hard and suffering from too many unpaid hours grading, etc.), the fact that there is basically no monetary incentive for good performance (everyone's on the same pay ladder generally based on level of education + years teaching), dysfunctional administration (at the school and/or district level), lack of good colleagues, etc.
  - bsanr 5y ago
    I want you to understand how terribly unconvincing this is. You seem to have an agenda, but not necessarily the facts to support it, so you're engaging with hand-wave-y generalization and, "Just trust me"-level rhetoric. This conversation began with concrete numbers, and if you want the initial presumption to stand you're going to have to end with them, too.
eesmith 5y ago
Certainly. My point is that the analysis presented here is far from complete. As I commented at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28826659 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28826659 , "Many people have studied this question, resulting in publications with conclusions which are all over the place" "Intrinsic motivation" means that individual teachers are being underpaid for their work, compared to market values. Tenure doesn't really exist like your sketch. Teachers for grade N+1 really don't want unprepared students from grade N. Even if it did, why should so-called "motivated" teachers do unpaid extracurricular work, and work from home in the evenings and weekends. Certainly if they used their motivation to get a part-time job they could make more money.
- kyleee 5y ago
  Agree with much of what you're saying

by kyleee 5y ago

bsanr 5y ago

This is goalpoast-moving. You should include the average payout of retirement planning in the private sector, for comparison. I will be shocked if we find a substantial difference, or advantage to the teachers. >Many lower quality teachers successfully avoid much or all of that unpaid work, especially in situations where they have strong job protections (tenure) We'll need citation for this too.

kyleee 5y ago
It's just part of the total comp calculation so it's a no-brainer to include in a good comparison. And defined benefit plans are quite desireable and becoming rarer, and have tended to be more stable in the case of market downturns. On the citation question, I don't have more to provide than experience from relatives who are teachers. It's quite well known that many bad teachers are quite entrenched, and those that realize their level of employment protection thread a good needle in terms of avoiding unpaid labor. It just requires caring about the job and results less, and many situations can push teachers towards feeling this way such as burnout (which can come from earnestly trying too hard and suffering from too many unpaid hours grading, etc.), the fact that there is basically no monetary incentive for good performance (everyone's on the same pay ladder generally based on level of education + years teaching), dysfunctional administration (at the school and/or district level), lack of good colleagues, etc.
- bsanr 5y ago
  I want you to understand how terribly unconvincing this is. You seem to have an agenda, but not necessarily the facts to support it, so you're engaging with hand-wave-y generalization and, "Just trust me"-level rhetoric. This conversation began with concrete numbers, and if you want the initial presumption to stand you're going to have to end with them, too.

eesmith 5y ago

Certainly. My point is that the analysis presented here is far from complete. As I commented at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28826659 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28826659 , "Many people have studied this question, resulting in publications with conclusions which are all over the place" "Intrinsic motivation" means that individual teachers are being underpaid for their work, compared to market values. Tenure doesn't really exist like your sketch. Teachers for grade N+1 really don't want unprepared students from grade N. Even if it did, why should so-called "motivated" teachers do unpaid extracurricular work, and work from home in the evenings and weekends. Certainly if they used their motivation to get a part-time job they could make more money.

kyleee 5y ago
Agree with much of what you're saying